Regress by Allison Fischbach

The taste of spring is in the air, yet it’s still too early and too chill for the green buds to safely come out. Before us, running the length of a football field is a straight shot of two iron rails stretching out towards the perspective point resting somewhere in the distance where it always stays but never is.

We had just eaten dinner and the sweet promise of a new warm evening drove us out of the hovel of library and desk to seek a walking path, to find escape in movement, in the promise of warmth. We had discovered the train tracks a few weeks earlier, when snow still spotted the sopping ground, now squelching with its release from freeze. They had laid under tangles of brush and saplings and ice slung carelessly into the ravine, while on the bridge overhead we stared straight down into the tussle of undergrowth to discern the two orange slats. Surprise. Tracks.

We entered the path at its mouth, opening into Morgnec road, and were amazed to find the tangle of vegetations cleared, as if simply for us, the sun already having banished snow. Barefooted and balanced on rail we tiptoed into the straightaway ravine, dipping below the sunline and sightline of the world above. Scattered along either side were hidden treasures, a plethora of forgotten emblems of collegiate life; bottles and shoes and key chains, a rusted keg. Tennis balls, mostly, hundreds of them aged and dirtied, blending into the foliage, absorbed into the earth.

To think, all of this as being covered again, wedging back into the elemental fray. Perhaps they were not enveloped completely, but as we walked parallel, each balanced on a beam of oxidized timelessness, we opened our eyes to our path. Regressing from the whistling streak of Chestertown’s cars into the tree-bending whistles of an invisible train charging over us, bent back, time standing still. To the left there, the willow tree, half-fallen, half-alive in which we used to burrow between roots and tell stories about pirate ships. Children from houses ten blocks away scattered and descended onto the giant like a beacon for our games of hunt and harvest.

Up the ravine a bit is a maple, sturdy, which has grown sideways in the dirt, and a group of three children, two girls and a young boy, have nailed plywood boards to the trunk at odd angles. Piles of stones and branches and cloth bits lay on the cleared ground. The trio scrambles to climb like wolves, their voices carrying on the air, squawking like crows from the trees. We are still standing on the tracks, watching as we climb the plywood tree, higher each minute now into the canopy of a white pine whose sap stains our shirts and arms and tangles itself into our hair. We cannot imagine why adults do not climb trees, and we swear we will never stop.

A plum tree farther down the line, under which a girl with a book and bare feet steps over the tussle of poison ivy and takes refuge in the dying specimen, bark split open, oozing sap where ants congregate. Sickly deep purple leaves flutter and shield her from view for a moment, and then she is there. For hours she will sit inclined, until her legs have fallen asleep hanging down to brush the tops of thorn bushes. She will stay until it is too dark to read and the lightening bugs coax her down.

Funny child ahead in the short patch of evergreen trees, kneeling over an anthill, a cut stump. Or the girl, almost adult now, standing on a promontory rock, her head bent through the trees. She is looking down at us as we walk, but she sees instead the rushing fullness of a stream and our faces are blocked by rhododendrons. Somewhere a deer threads silently through the underbrush and she stares, turns her cameras to it, but we cannot see from our time.

Yet what waits still is her path down hill and downstream, and through fields where foxes run, screeching threats and darting like demons. Through wildflowers and swamps of skunk cabbage and fallen barbed wire to where broken bottles and lost china have been beaten by the constant rush of time. To the places where evidence of existence is continuously lost, paths slowly covered and forgotten, synapses of memory abandoned and found years later, half-buried in the muck of lessons learned. Here we bend down and examine them, like a shining treasure, half-broken bottle, riverstone or skull, shoe abandoned for the coolness of forest floor, and wonder why we ever stopped climbing white pines, because we were afraid of sap on our feet.

Traversing Literature: Reading Outside the English Language by Allison Fischbach

A book I have never read has haunted me. Roberto Bolaño’s 2666, to be precise. You have probably never heard of it. Neither had I when I first encountered it in the bathroom of a Cork city student apartment, blearily drunk, as it rested on the back of the toilet. What a beautiful first introduction. I read a few pages- I had heard people talking about it- but I was a little too tipsy to concentrate much.

But when I tottered back to the party I was surprised found people discussing it. “Wait, that book in the bathroom?” What followed was a shout of “Yes!” and a toast to “BOLAÑO!” which became a running joke. I didn’t understand the humor, but I know we toasted to Bolaño a lot that semester.

From then on it followed me, from an airport bookstore to someone reading in a cafe, I would again and again come across that thousand-page tome in discussion, in review. It is the antithesis of the travel books I was reading; not compact, not easy, not uplifting- not English, but in my journeys I was drawn to each cover I found presenting that unexplained number. Is it a year? A future? A mystical note? A count? A plane to catch.

“BOLAÑO!”

So what makes this book remarkable? On the whole not much, but when I finally scraped the funds to buy myself a copy I noticed with relish that this story is internationally bound. It moves from Germany to Italy to Austria to England to Spain to Argentina to Mexico to America and back. It crosses national and cultural boundaries without a second thought. It leaps continents and comes back. It is world literature.

It is somewhat rare to find a modern American novel that transcends international boundaries. Instead the trend is towards folding in, rooted around what it means to be ‘American.’  Identity is a favorite preoccupation of modern American literature and America in general. The recent spout of television shows and scientific projects oriented on the tracing of genealogical histories only supports this. Our diverse backgrounds and familial roots make definition hard, and the search for American identity is fully understandable given that context.

But at the same time, are we missing something? Are we isolated on our continental island, preoccupied with exploring ourselves? Meanwhile are we unfamiliar with, and unwilling to be familiar with the larger world? Is internal literature only part of a larger trend? I personally think it is, and I think in the realm of literature a foreign language is as much a barrier as national borders.

As an English major I find I’ve been exposed a good deal of translated literature; Homer, Chretien de Troyes, Augustine, Kafka. But I have not read these works for the light they shed on modern international understanding. Rather, I have read them because they are the roots of our own cultural tradition. These pieces appear so old as to defy any linguistic boundary. They are classics, and as such escape the stigma of the foreign by virtue of being the foundation of the contemporary American novel. They both outline our own literary tradition, and are also so far removed from their modern day national and cultural counterparts as to be almost distinct entities. So we read them, and we read them in English, almost unaware that English is not their native format.

The almost all-pervasive use of the English language would make it appear that we are not limited because of our mono-linguistic abilities, but we are. English does not have a monopoly on literature, and even in translation finding books that transcend our American themes exposes us to unforeseen realms of thought that can mirror our own, or draw us to analyze problems we have never thought of before. We are the product of literature that stretches beyond the limited grasp of the American language.

I suppose I never thought of other nations having the same living literary life as the English language, all I have read of them being centuries old and translated into English. But other languages do have vibrant modern literature, and it is worth reading. Even in translation multicultural novels focus on problems outside America’s identity search. Instead they focus on struggles in a larger world, and how we relate to these stories shows how beyond culture and language, our questions in an increasingly homogenized world are so often the same, and 2666 more than any other novel taught me this.

Reading 2666 was like plunging into a diverse culture myself. The immersion into a culture wholly unlike our own- without even the comfort of a native author- is bewildering and sometimes hard to understand, but I would venture to say it is the best teaching experience next to being there. The change in grammar, the untranslated slang, the attitudes of the characters can be as foreign as the place names. Setting can be hard to picture and vocabulary confusing. I confess, Wikipedia has helped more than I would like to admit on this thousand-page journey.

Our background in historical world literature may be better than our experience in modern world literature, but I would implore you now, or while drying out your information-soaked mind this summer, that you pick up a current novel from a different culture. I myself will be continuing my seven-month plunge through 2666, but there are any number of translated and English international literature out there that might spark your interest. From German sci fi to Columbian magical realism, here are some authors and novels to browse:

Recommendations:
Haruki Murakami- Japanese (Japan)
Gabriel Garcia Marquez- Spanish (Columbia)
Carlos Ruiz Zafon The Shadow of the Wind- Spanish (Spain)
Herbert W. Franke- German (Austria)
Frank Schätzing The Swarm- German (Germany)
Narrudin Farah- English (Somalia)
Virkram Seth- English (India)

You can also visit the PEN American Center, which brings together international authors to promote literary freedom. This year the Rose O’Neill Literary House will host a series of talks with PEN writer and Argentinean novelist Rodrego Fresan, April 19th to the 25th.

Watching Haiti by Allison Fischbach

Somehow I missed it. Almost the entire thing. I was busy, as you can imagine, running up and down my Facebook page and the streets of Baltimore. Spending precious hours mooching neighborhood cafe WiFi and waiting for something to do. This is why it was two days before I heard about the earthquake in Haiti.

We have a tendency to joke that our lives as college students extract us from the larger world. We exist on an island where our news comes by e-mail and our food by dining hall. Papers and events exist only in the community we have established to occupy ourselves, while somewhere else, far removed from the present state of our lives, other worlds exist. People cry out with gut-wrenching sorrow. Maybe we will be flicking through channels one day and see them screaming on the ruined streets, and it will feel horrible. But quickly, the story will end, and we will turn off the television, head out to the bar, forget the glimpse we received.

It’s a problem presented by many international crises. Haiti is not the first time we have been exposed to the utter destruction of a third-world country and felt helpless in the most impotent way. No doubt memories of the 2004 Indonesian tsunami circle around with the latest crisis to reach our awareness. Even with the copious use of Twitter and social networking sites to spread news quickly and aid in bridging the gap between places, we are still so far away. That which brings us together also heightens the distance between us. It is hard to feel we can reach somewhere so far away both geographically and socially. The little that these people had has been reduced to nothing at all. Can we fathom that? Can we put ourselves in that position, either sympathetically or empathetically? It is hard and we always appear too slow on the uptake to move ourselves to provide sufficient aid, but is it ever possible to be fast enough? There is no standard for the type of speed needed, there is only an immediate need there and us here and a distance that translates to time, and time is never fast enough.

What appears worse is that there is no one to blame. There is no terrorist ring or gang racket or government corruption here, just the ebb and flow of natural cycles. There is no retaliation on the movement of tectonic plates. Left in the hollow of blame there is an impotent feeling of helplessness and the futile desire to understand why. The only option is to turn in circles on ourselves: to blame the calloused and removed public, the lazy government, the misused funds, the disorganized efforts to help.

It seems sometimes as if all we can do is watch, while what we watch changes. As the month since the earthquake occurred has passed, our connection to Haiti has shifted to more immediate news of snowfall and scandal. Meanwhile, people still ache, but the distance of both time and space makes it hard for us to feel the extent of this tragedy. Statistics say over 200,000 people have died, but numbers so high do not seem to elicit a more sympathetic response.

Some, like columnist Shankar Vedantam*, have noted that widespread incidents of tragedy don’t cause us to feel any more sympathetic to the cause. This is not to say that at heart people are terrible, but that it is harder for us to sympathize on a mass level when we are but one person. Our capacity for empathy is limited in certain respects to the individual who is like us, with whom we can relate. It is hard for us to capture the extent of massive loss of life, and eventually we turn away, unable to identify with the magnitude, able only to think that it is ‘tragic’ without feeling as if it were our own.

Now that we realize the distance of time, space, culture and nature is against us, what else is there to do? Do we lie down and accept that aid is futile? Do we turn off the television and go back to playing in the snow? What is remarkable about human beings is that when all these factors pit themselves against us we still fight to help.

The best thing we might be able to do is give. I admit, I fear that in writing an article addressing our perception of the event rather than the facts of the event itself, I am in fact taking away the focus on those affected and putting it on us, but the truth is none of this is about us as college students or Americans, it is about humans as people. This is not about perception, but about reality in the individuals still bereft, shocked and homeless. Are we able to see outside of our collegiate island to the places where people are still without roofs in a looming rainy season?

There is a certain need for us to continue with our lives: we do not all have the speculation needed to take the next flight out, repair the wounded or console the bereft. It would do little good for us to stay stranded in catatonic sorrow. But at the same time we cannot act as if the damage has already been repaired and lives restored. It may be that Haiti does not recover for decades, while in another month the television will stop showing aftermath and move on. But that does not mean everything is over, and that does not mean we need to turn away as told. All of the time, distance, cultural separation and disaffected nature mean nothing when we think of one person lost in a maze of devastation.

*Taken from an excerpt from his book “The Hidden Brain: How Our Unconscious Minds Elect Presidents, Control Markets, Wage Wars and Save Our Lives,” published in the Washington Post, January 17, 2010. < http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/11/AR2010011102007.html?hpid=topnews&sid=ST2010011304181>

That, and a Tree: Growing Up on an Evergreen Farm by Allison Fischbach

That and a Tree, Growing up on an Evergreen Farm By Allison Fischbach

When I was seven years old, my parents opened the Woodbine Christmas Tree Farm, composed of a seven-acre plot on the border of Carroll County, Maryland. As a child, I would play in the fields until I knew them in the way we know intimate memories. Summers included firefly hunts and hide-and-seek, autumn was chilly walks and bonfires, winter was – and is – the selling season.

The tree farm is more than a space occupied with a seasonal business, it is my home. Our house rests on a slight raise over the fields. The windows of my mother’s bedroom stare out at the spot where deer appear from the woods in the summer and thread their way through the evergreens, grey spots in the verdant growth. Year-round we have the green fields to tread and tend and admire.

There is more than a season to Christmas trees and the annual ritual of “choose and cut” carried out each December. The year is filled with marks of tree care, from spring shearing to summer mowing, traversing the fields in the John Deere, performing acrobatics around the saplings (and I have mown down more than my fair share). The summer and fall also offer opportunities for thinning the diseased trees or shaping the plump ones.

When we first opened, we grew two types of trees: the perennial favorite Douglas Fir and the less popular Scotch Pine. The pines soon developed a fungus from whence falling needles and rotting bark ensued. Now we must cut our own trees down in the autumn off-season when we see their needles drop, and we burn them in the back patch. The woodsmoke adds an appropriate scent to the air, when the whole scene is on fire with chlorophyll. While it is disappointing to burn a dying tree and the fungus has made the fields thin, our firs grow on, unaffected among newer spruce specimens, keeping the farm going.

Shearing is my father’s job, each tree shaped personally by means of a machete. It takes about two weeks on and off to do all the trees, my father out swinging for about two or three hours a day, before or after work. He wears construction yellow shin-guards, grooved with the evidence of wrong swings. I don’t know how he cuts them so nonchalantly. A few strokes and the gangly mass of off-shooting limbs is formed like a topiary into a teardrop.

A good tree has a straight trunk. Curves at the base or in the center will make the tree lopsided in the stand and cause an added grievance to holiday frustration. When the trees grow on an incline, we have to be careful, because that’s what causes the trunk curvature, but our fields inevitably incline towards the forest and we encounter a number of angle-cut stumps come January that have to be trimmed into the ground. The round disc of a trimmed stump is the best potpourri I know of, fresh beads of sap forming around the rings and clotting in the chill. I keep them in my room or put them around the house in terra-cotta dishes until it smells as if the sap runs in the very walls.

We used to have a tiny book on Christmas trees, complete with scientific names and diagrams, and I would hover over it every year committing to memory which tree to recommend for this or that specified desire. I know pines aren’t as sturdy as spruce and have a tendency to be too sappy, but their fragrance is more pervasive. Spruce are sturdy and prickly, good for heavy ornaments, and blue spruce have a fine silver tinge to them that one cannot help but marvel at in the brown of winter. Fir trees are flexible but strong, soft-needled, and my favorite tree, if I am permitted trade partiality.

When you buy your tree, regardless if it balled and burlapped, fresh cut or from a lot, do you know about the life of that five or six foot specimen? (Much less a larger one for the cathedral ceilings.) We can’t grow 12-foot trees in part because shearing and shaping becomes unwieldy, but also because discerning customers choose them long before they reach such heights.

We purchase our saplings from a commercial nursery in western Maryland. They arrive at the house in a big cardboard box with a green tree logo on the side, wrapped tightly together in moisture-retentive plastic and packed like sapling sardines. We separate them into individual pots, packing them with dark, rich soil. They are only about a hand’s length tall at this point and wispy, newly green. The pots sit outside for a few months, sometimes a year, before spring plants them in the thawed ground.

It takes about five years for an evergreen to root to the point where substantial growth begins. The five or six foot trees, the heights that are most popular, are about ten (depending on the species). The trees we sold the year I was ten had been planted the spring I was still wrapped in my mother’s womb. I had run through them, hid and camped and built forts on their perimeter. The trees we sell now were planted when I was ten. They stood to watch me through high school, watch me leave for college, watch as the apple tree came down and the cicadas arrived, as the old shed was toppled and the garage built. I’ll admit I think of them as sentient, sometimes.

After they are cut, they are dragged up to the car park, bailed in plastic netting, and secured onto truck or trunk or roof. It’s not exactly hard to say goodbye. The truth is we raise trees to cut them down, which I suppose is not what one wants to think about come holiday season. Sometimes it’s sad to think that the whole time we are enveloped in our chilly holiday cheer there is this dead tree between us, more like an end to life than a beginning.

But who is to blame? We plant, we raise, we cut, we mulch, we plant and on again. Our own tree goes through the mulcher every year, coming out releasing the last of its beautiful scent into the winter air as it gets spread around the property, in field or garden or flowerbed.

There’s a lingering guilt to the tree farm now that I’ve grown up to the fact that we raise trees, these wonderful sturdy symbols of vitality, only to cut them down. In those terms it seems a bit grotesque, no? The counterpoint, I suppose, is the tree in the window frosted with lights, or even the sweet-scented mulch spread in the fields, or the tiny saplings springing up from the cardboard box, or the community of customers and woodsmoke and pine.

I love tree farming. It is the hallmark of the season. We are not holiday-oriented as a rule, our only décor being candles and evergreen clippings. There is no fat Santa in the yard or 24/7 holiday radio, instead there is a mug of coffee and a green apron and the cold air outside on weekends. There is talk of the neighborhood or the season, where people are from, how long they have searched for a tree. I suppose this kind of immediate and open fellowship is what the holidays should be decorated with.

That, and a tree.

A Terrifying Novel of a Different Tenor: Cormac McCarthy’s “The Road”, Review by Allison Fischbach

I’ve been hearing a lot about this book in the past few years, since its Pulitzer Prize win in 2007, to the news that a movie is in the works (starring Viggo Mortinson!). I actually bought a copy for myself two years ago and set to reading it, but after the first 20 pages I just couldn’t go on. So it sat in my room until my mom found it a few weeks ago, finished it, and encouraged me to finish it as well so discussion could ensue. After the two-year struggle to end this 287-page paperback, I have come to the conclusion that The Road is a new brand of heavy reading.

Based in a post-apocalyptic landscape vaguely reminiscent of the western United States, The Road is the story of a father and son who are on a journey to the elusive ‘South,’ a place that the father hopes has retained some part of civilization. The entire narrative is set in a number of instances, pervaded by a strong sense of grey. Perhaps that is the best word to describe the deep tenor, not wholly of loss, but of hopelessness.

McCarthy’s narrative is woven with Christian allusion, but at first glance the story is focused mainly on human endurance; how much the mind and body can take before resigning. What is intriguing and confusing about the man is his motivation, never wavering for an instant, to keep his son alive in a world almost dead.

To understand this confusion, you must picture a world where the sky is so polluted with fallout that you can never see the sun. Light lasts for perhaps eight hours, maybe less. All plant and animal life is dying, if not already dead, and it is cold. Clothing is scarce, and what is left is worn. You are always on the verge of starvation, and, most often, you live without shelter or heat. Towns are dangerous, yet unavoidable, looted. As empty as they seem, the connecting roads are used as a throughway by a motley conglomeration of survivors—rapists, cannibals, and those driven to madness. Corpses are unavoidable. Every promise is thwarted with some awful realization of sheer desolation. In this world, hope seems completely pointless, for if what we hope for is life—better life for ourselves, for our children, for civilization, even for the natural world without us—what is left to hope for in a world so utterly destroyed?

It seems McCarthy’s novel makes us ask the question: Would we go on? What would make us want to live even in a world so utterly destroyed, vacant, dangerous, and without the beauty of human creation that usually drives so many to continue? As the narrative progresses, the man’s every hope of finding some piece of color in a dead world is dashed. We are continually forced to question why he does not give up and end the misery of both himself and his son. Rationally, we do not know why he continues, but, considering his memories of a world before the desolation, memories of the world we live in—secure, enjoyable—we can sympathize with his desire to hold on to life. 

But the boy is an interesting case. He is born on what may be the last day of the world. His mother, a vague and terse figure in the past, has killed herself sometime before the narrative starts. The three—man, woman, and child—prove themselves to represent the three options for us to consider, not as survivors, but as people. The man—who is driven by some deep, untouchable hope for life, even until the end of the story—seems to defy rational thinking in his compulsion. The distances to which he goes for his son are admirable and confounding, when others, most notably the woman, would see the future as over and simply refuse the struggle. The woman herself is another person for readers to consider. Her suicide is something we could see as cowardice, considering she leaves her family to struggle without her, but it would also be irresponsible to say that we would not consider doing the same. She sees the sheer extent of the lifelessness she is faced with and simply chooses to preempt the inevitable course of nature. This is not an unsympathetic action.

But the boy, whose knowledge of life is limited to this desolate world, harbors a terrifying view of life as only fatigue, hunger, and cold. In the end, his life is, and has always been, pain. It is almost shocking for us to consider this kind of worldview, our lives being as relatively comfortable as they are, but it is not unreasonable. This boy is unlike the woman and the man who are able to compare the past and the present; he has been given no basis for comparison. He has no past to either compel him to give up or to continue. His life is hopeless. He does harbor notions of suicide, but still he walks the road.

Why? What is it in us that makes us want to hold on through pain and hopelessness? Beyond hope, beyond any idea of a salvation, what is left? For the boy there is a basic ideal of the ‘fire,’ a virtue instilled in him by his father. The pair carry the ‘fire,’ a symbol that encompasses the physical properties of light and warmth, but also stands for intelligence and, like the tongues of flame that descended on the apostles, enlightenment. The touch of the fire of the Spirit, perhaps. I do not think it is too bold to say McCarthy certainly had this in mind.

I would be loath to divulge the ending of this intriguing exploration of the human will and so I will leave that up to you to discover. It is a heavy novel for one so short—its sense of the indescribable prompts most of the philosophical questions surrounding this story. Perhaps it is appropriate that post-apocalyptic fiction is popular in the falling season that is autumn, but beware—or perhaps be on the lookout—for The Road. It is no Zombie Survival Guide, but it is quite infinitely more terrifying and more satisfying a read than I have encountered in a very long time.

One Encounter by Allison Fischbach

On the first of June, I returned from five months spent living in a dirty student apartment in Cork, Ireland. It was what you would call a “life-changing experience,” where I learned all the usual lessons of independence: cooking, cleaning, finance, time management, etc. A familiar theme in all “coming-of-age” novels and not something you expect to be so emotionally real until the actuality of age comes crashing down on you.

Needless to say, I changed rapidly to adjust to the new environment and the new people; to become a person I didn’t recognize, but who I enjoyed all the more for her difference. So as the first of June approached and my one-way ticket to Dulles International became more and more relevant, I found it hard to say goodbye in any definite way. Rather than face the looming separation, I took to nightly pub-crawls my last week in Cork, soaking up each experience in preparation for my long summer devoid of gallivanting down city streets with people I felt I knew so well after so little time. Summer would be devoid of all the stories I had amassed, few of them even worth telling.

But on one of those nights something in me cracked (sparked by a stupid thing, really—they were out of curly fries at McDonald’s), and I ended up crying on the dark shining streets of Cork among all the people I would miss. To the passerby I must have looked a wreck, a dim caricature of a girl crying in the street. Is that even worth writing? It was embarrassing and relieving, but as I was escorted home, my heart splayed on the damp cobbles, I was somehow less of a knot. As Melina would say, her Galician accent coming through, “It is good to hurt so much, because you know that it is important.”

I was watched and waved into my Leeside flat, first floor, and I demanded promises that my outburst would be kept secret, except, of course, for the massed city of witnesses milling down Grand Parade. But I hardly thought of them.

Inside I staggered and changed for bed, washed my face clean, and then spotted on my pillow a note from Abby who, asleep now, would be gone in the morning. For the second time that night, I lost all ability to read. My eyes awash with tears, I sobbed methodically, silently into my arms, hoping not to wake my still resident flat-mates.

But I had forgotten my open window, pulled-back curtain—I was completely on display to the street right outside, and that was when I heard her ask, “Is she okay?”

I kept my head down, still as a statue, what good would it be to acknowledge her? I refused to be interrupted in my silent despair.

“She’s probably asleep,” he answered.

“She looks awfully sad.”

Still as a stone I sat, waiting for their receding footsteps, until I heard “Excuse me miss, are you alright?” and unable to ignore it anymore I looked up into the face of a thin twenty-something with brunette hair and an orange pallor in the streetlights.

“Yes,” I said, wiping the tears from my face, snot spreading onto my arm, “I’ll be okay.”

“Why are you sad? Is someone hurt?” In that earnest inquiry I felt suddenly petty. No, no one was hurt. I was hurting, yes, but nothing dire. No life-or-death scenario, just a simple girl not wanting to go home, like a spoiled child. I was ashamed.

“No, no…no one is hurt.” I stopped. I wanted to tell her everything, right there, to this stranger that I would never see again. But spilling my whole trivial narrative—that would be immodest and indecent, and I was silent. Still, she looked at me compassionately, expectantly. Swallowing, I went on slowly, “It’s just, I’m leaving Ireland soon, and I’ll really miss all the people I met here.” Simple statement. Petty reasoning. My voice an incoherent mumble stuffed with tears, choking on them. Could she even understand me? I could tell she was not Irish, not American, and my English was atrocious through the tears and the barred window.

“Where are you from?”

“America. I’m American.”

I didn’t know what kind of response my admission would illicit, but I was surprised. “I understand,” she said congenially, “I am French. I am leaving soon too. I will miss it, but I must go home.” I turned to look at her, in her late-night dress, her date standing awkwardly in the background of the Grattan Street sidewalk. Then she swung her purse off her arm, “I have something for you.”

What? “No, no, that’s alright. I’ll be alright.”

“Give me your hands.” This conversation through the window at three in the morning in a foreign country, strange enough as it was, made me calmer. I did put my hands out, hesitantly, sticking them out the awkward angled window and she, standing on the rail, gripped them. In one palm was something cool and metal and she spoke, “I do not know if you are Christian.” I paused, not ready to explain my ideas on religion, and in the end I only smiled, “Do you mind if I pray?”

“No, no.”

And she did, and I don’t remember the words she said, but the firm human grip of her hands was like a full-body embrace, and when she finally looked up she put the metal into my hand. A metal ring. Ten small beads welded onto a loop, and on top the cross, a figure of Christ prostrate, and when looped onto my finger it was comforting and warm from being pressed so willfully into my palm.

“Do you feel better?”

“Yes, thank you. Yes.”

“It will be alright.”

“I know, thank you. Thank you.”

“When do you leave?”

“Monday.”

“I hope you get home safely.”

“Thank you. Thank you.” It was all I could think to say.

So she pushed back off the railing and nodded, taking her date in arm again, and retreated towards the quay. I sat on my bed fingering the metal ring, my tears drying into invisible patterns of salt. Eventually I pulled the curtains shut, placed the ring quietly next to my earth-coloured buddha, and crawled under the duvet.

Regress by Allison Fischbach
Traversing Literature: Reading Outside the English Language by Allison Fischbach
Watching Haiti by Allison Fischbach
That and a Tree, Growing up on an Evergreen Farm By Allison Fischbach
A Terrifying Novel of a Different Tenor: Cormac McCarthy’s “The Road”, Review by Allison Fischbach
One Encounter by Allison Fischbach

About:

The Collegian is a feature publication at Washington College in Chestertown, Maryland. The Collegian is published monthly. We print writing and artwork from students at Washington College. To submit e-mail collegian_editor@washcoll.edu

The Collegian has moved sites! You can now find us at OUR NEW WEBSITE!

Following: